|
Post by Skull on Nov 14, 2004 17:40:37 GMT -5
cool, I won't but I will only be one year too young to vote. But I guess that's alright, I can wait.
|
|
|
Post by GryphonDarkFalcon on May 25, 2005 14:17:41 GMT -5
i still think nader would have been a better pres., b/c bush is just a selfish texan, nader is awesome, i actually knew him, before he ran
|
|
|
Post by lightningbolt1312 on May 25, 2005 17:00:52 GMT -5
alright, it looks like I have the minority here, but I would say Kerry or nader, or anyone else BUT bush! Who got us into a war we can't finish? We have lost almost the same amount of people in Iraq as we had lost during 9/11. Who has created the no child left behind law where schools have to use their own money to make people who are disabled go and take a test and still pass. Over 3,000,000 people in Florida this year did not pass the test, and had to stay in the same grade over again. That is just one state too. And many people will just drop out of school because of this. Also, bush is anti enviroment. He has made it legal to cut down almost twice as much forest. Since Bush has been in office, things seem to be going wrong. i don't think bush should have been re elected, but thats just my point! =) If you want to argue with me go ahead, I got lots more information! hehe! =)
|
|
|
Post by GryphonDarkFalcon on May 25, 2005 20:52:58 GMT -5
exactly my thought lightning, i hate bush with all there is in me, he is responsible for the mess were in, the rising gas prices, the higher taxes, etc. and its all u morons faults for electing him in the first place, he doesnt understand that if he cuts down much more forests, we r goig to get many more foreigners, increasing the air pollution, and thinning out the breathable air, there will also be a lack of wild life, so scarth no more fishin if that continues, but thankfully we wont have to worry about it in our lifetimes, but think of how harsh life will be for our children, and their children, and if we still have a place to live their children, we are killing ourselves here, the rising pop. also makes it more expemnsive for land or any other goods, and also like lightning, i too ahve a lot more reasons, that bush is a %@($en f*g, who doesnt deserve to be in office, we need to elect an old man, who realizes just what will hapen if we don stop what we are doing!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by lightningbolt1312 on May 25, 2005 21:11:28 GMT -5
GryphonDarkFalcon, you are my hero! lol! What you said is exactly what I was trying to say! Thank you for putting down into words! =) ps. this doesn't mean I think anyone who likes bush is stupid, I just disagree with his ideals, and his way of running this country.
|
|
|
Post by GryphonDarkFalcon on May 25, 2005 22:31:47 GMT -5
nader was someone who i really believed will turn the country around into a better direction, but thats just my opinion, were me and lightning the only people who greatly disliked bush?
|
|
|
Post by Skull on May 27, 2005 18:33:48 GMT -5
alright, it looks like I have the minority here, but I would say Kerry or nader, or anyone else BUT bush! Who got us into a war we can't finish? We have lost almost the same amount of people in Iraq as we had lost during 9/11. Who has created the no child left behind law where schools have to use their own money to make people who are disabled go and take a test and still pass. Over 3,000,000 people in Florida this year did not pass the test, and had to stay in the same grade over again. That is just one state too. And many people will just drop out of school because of this. Also, bush is anti enviroment. He has made it legal to cut down almost twice as much forest. Since Bush has been in office, things seem to be going wrong. i don't think bush should have been re elected, but thats just my point! =) If you want to argue with me go ahead, I got lots more information! hehe! =) well if you think about it, it wasn't only Bush that started the war, it was the Iraqies, they started 9/11 and so we started war, but I agree now, I hate Bush! He Charged us because we have wild animals on our property and we can be poaching and noone will know it, we almost had all but 5 acres of our land taken away because of him! Bush Sucks!
|
|
|
Post by lightningbolt1312 on May 28, 2005 9:39:38 GMT -5
thank you Scarthman! =) One side note, when you aid that Iraqi people did 9/11, they actually didn't. That was wny we went into afghanistan right after 9/11 and swept the taliban from there. We went into iraqi looking for weapons of mass destruction, but found none, and so now Bush is trying (but failing) to put 9/11 blame upon those people. Sadaam might have wanted the afghanistanians to attack the US, but we have no proof that he was behind anything of 9/11. I think that most people have turned the iraq war into a war fighting for 9/11, but in reality they had nothing to do with it. Sorry if I sound a little long winded, but I don't like it when people say Iraqi's helped 9/11. People in iraq already have a bad name here, and we don't need to make it worse! =) But i am VERY glad scarthman has changed sides! Bush is a enviroment hater!
|
|
|
Post by GryphonDarkFalcon on May 28, 2005 11:20:45 GMT -5
besides we did still start the chain leading to 9/11, which is another reason we learn history, u see sadam didnt just pop up out of nowhere, hes been fighting with the US for a long time, and we started that, remember the whole weapons of mass destruction, bush started that too
|
|
|
Post by Skull on May 28, 2005 20:57:12 GMT -5
yes I know, Bush sucks! Kerry of Nader would be much better, the only problem I have right now, if Kerry or Nader become president, then they will call off the war and retreat, if we do that, then the other side will come to the US, so right now, we need Bush to stay until this war is over, if the other people come here, then we have a problem, we can't have a war in the US, there are cities every 5 miles apart! what will we do then? so many cities will be destroyed, and then what do we do?
|
|
|
Post by lightningbolt1312 on May 29, 2005 0:01:50 GMT -5
yeah, I agree that we CANNOT remove troops from Iraq, or else we might as well say hello to WWIII, except with gruella attacks on our own country. But I dunno if anyone else would pull the troops out, but now its too late anyways.
|
|
|
Post by Skull on May 29, 2005 20:59:08 GMT -5
well I know Kerry would, I don't know about Nader, but right now, we need to keep Bush, even if we don't like him, he is keeping the troops there until the war is over.
|
|
|
Post by lightningbolt1312 on May 29, 2005 21:34:10 GMT -5
the one problem is that this war is not going to be over, for a LONG time, we need a diferent president, that doesn't pull out all the troops, but slowly start taking them out, or something different then what we are doing now
|
|
|
Post by Skull on May 29, 2005 21:51:36 GMT -5
yah, I think that we should send in all of the troops, jets, planes, helocopters, Tanks, ect. and just take them all out really quick. Then the war will be over and we don't have to worry about anything.
|
|
|
Post by lightningbolt1312 on May 29, 2005 21:54:31 GMT -5
well if we did that we would be killing A LOT of innocent people and then we would not only have to deal with the entire united nations, we would start turning into a country a lot like germany in WWII that killed 6 million jews. I can understand why you would say that, but that would probably start WWIII, and then out comes atomic bombs, and then there goes the world... Do you understand what I'm saying?
|
|